Once you decide to devote you to ultimately self improvement, you are ready to take your first methods TN Requin Cher on the path to a more enjoyable, more lucrative daily life. There are many roadways to pick from than imaginable, even though. How could you obtain the pathway that meets your preferences? Please read on for some sound advice on selecting the correct self improvement pathway for your personal trip.
Make a list of things which are dragging you lower or maybe driving a car you crazy. Then break down this listing into facts you can and can not handle. Know that there is very little that can be done with the things that are from your management and try to forget about that. Instead set your attention to the things that you may handle.
Monitor Requin Nike TN how you spend your time. Our lives are loaded because of so many routines which can be outright time wasters. Imagine what we should may have completed over our way of life if we got of better spent time we expended mindlessly sitting down in front of the television! Keep track of your time so that you know where by it can be proceeding.
To completely develop as being a person, study change. Seek out alternation in your environment and enjoy the way it happens. When you begin to comprehend change, you will start sharpening your capabilities to adapt to your circumstance and be a lot more equipped in your own http://www.officieltnrequinstore.com daily life to face your own personal obstacles.
No matter whether you work or go to school, it is essential to attempt to preserve an assertive personality. Should you be not robust, you can find went around, that could decrease your assurance and raise the level of stress and anxiety that you simply experience. Be strong and assured to lower your problems.
Construct your self-esteem by managing how you speak with oneself! Be nice to yourself and accept your very little foibles and mistakes. Nobody is perfect, and you also most likely wouldn't by hypercritical and unforgiving of others, so don't work that way in the direction of TN Requin Cher your self! Permit you to ultimately make some mistakes and become special.
With self improvement, make sure that you gain knowledge from others faults. This will be significant since we have seen numerous people who have arrive before you that have produced mistakes and created their details incredibly open public. There is no much more important resource than utilizing the connection with other people and implementing it to on your own.
Increase your fiscal cost savings. This is a good process containing rewards beyond your personal development schedule. Usually devote rather less than you get and placed the surplus into cost savings. Also a very small cost savings can present you with crucial stability and offer rainy-time sources to assist you to by means of unforeseen http://www.officieltnrequinstore.com difficulties.
With any luck ,, studying this information has presented you some beneficial food items for believed in picking out your way to self improvement. Regardless of the time period of your journey or its vacation spot, it is a vacation worth using. If you utilize careful hard work to improving on your own, you can achieve some remarkable outcomes. Your final results grow to be just that much more remarkable once you primary your efforts intelligently.
For details, you have to look at Listed below Reports. Tips To Nike TN Discovering Contentment In Your Daily Life What You Can Do TN Requin Cher To Further Improve Your Personal Growth
Global surveys show environmental concerns rank low among public concernsPublic release date: 25-Feb-2013 [ | E-mail | Share ]
Contact: Ray Boyer boyer-ray@norc.org 312-330-6433 NORC at the University of Chicago
Newly released international study reveals that environmental issues in general and global climate change in particular are a low priority for people in the United States and around the world
2/25/2013, Chicago, IL--A newly released international study reveals that the issue of climate change is not a priority for people in the United States and around the world.
The surveys showed that when asked to rank priority worries, people were five times more likely to point to the economy over the environment. Additionally, when asked about climate change, people identified the issue as more of a national problem than a personal concern.
Coordinated surveys, conducted by the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) in 33 countries from 1993 through 2010, "are the first and only surveys that put long-term attitudes toward environmental issues in general and global climate change in particular in an international perspective," said Tom W. Smith, Director of the General Social Survey, a project of the independent research organization NORC at the University of Chicago, and author of a paper that summarizes the surveys.
In the surveys, respondents were asked the relative importance of eight issues: health care, education, crime, the environment, immigration, the economy, terrorism and poverty.
The economy ranked highest in concern in 15 countries, followed by health care in eight, education in six, poverty in two, and terrorism and crime in one country each. Immigration and the environment did not make the top of the list in any country over the 17-year period; in the United States, the economy ranked as the highest concern, while concern for the environment ranked sixth.
In terms of national averages, the order of concern was the economy (25 percent); health care (22.2) education (15.6); poverty (11.6); crime (8.6) environment (4.7), immigration (4.1) and terrorism (2.6), the surveys showed. Terrorism's low ranking was notable in light of the widespread attention the issue has received since 2001, though it topped the list of concerns in Turkey.
The paper, "Public Attitudes towards Climate Change and Other Global Environmental Issues across Time and Countries, 1993-2010," was presented recently at the "Policy Workshop: Public Attitudes and Environmental Policy in Canada and Europe, Canada-European Transatlantic Dialogue," at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada.
NORC is issuing the survey summary on behalf of the ISSP, a consortium of survey research organizations in 49 countries. The ISSP coordinates studies on topics worldwide and uses the same scientific standards to make the findings representative of the nations' populations.
A focus on the environment
In the United States, only 3.6 percent of the people surveyed selected the environment as the nation's most pressing issue, as opposed to 15 percent of the people in Norway, which had the highest level of environmental concern.
The surveys also asked questions about worries concerning particular kinds of environmental problems, including global climate change. One asked which problem among nine was most important for their country as a whole as opposed to the individual.
Air pollution ranked first in 13 countries, followed by climate change, which was the top concern in 10 countries. In another question, the surveys asked people which environmental problem they considered most personally dangerous and found that in only three countries was climate change listed as the most dangerous environmental problem, trailing nuclear power plants and industrial air pollution.
"One reason for the relatively low ranking of climate change is that people often believed it did not directly affect them. Climate change is seen more as a country-level problem than as a personal problem," Smith said. "While 14.6 percent cited it as the most important environmental issue for their country, only 9 percent rated it first for themselves."
The latest surveys were completed in 2010. Similar surveys have been conducted since 1993, and little change has been noted on people's concern for climate change. Differences exist among the countries, however, suggesting that widespread public support for current action on the issue will represent a major shift in attitude.
The surveys indicate some expectation for greater future concern about climate change. "The greater mentioning of climate change as a problem by those under 30 versus those 70 and older probably reflects generational effects and if so, should tend to increase levels of concern in the future," Smith said.
Environmental issues are of greatest concern in Scandinavian nations, Switzerland and Canada. They were followed by France, Austria, Finland, the former West Germany, Taiwan, Korea, and New Zealand. Toward the bottom of the list are Croatia, Latvia, Chile, Turkey, Lithuania and Argentina.
Climate change was listed as the top environmental concern in Japan, West Germany, Canada, Britain and Scandinavia, where between 19 and 26 percent of the population indicated it was their top environmental issue.
###
Smith is co-founder of the ISSP and on the group's Standing Committee. He is also Past President the World
Association for Public Opinion Research.
The General Social Survey (GSS) is a project of NORC at the University of Chicago with principal funding provided by the National Science Foundation. It is a unique and valuable resource that has tracked the opinions and behaviors of Americans over the last four decades. The GSS is NORC's longest running project, and one of its most influential. Except for U.S. Census data, the GSS is the most frequently analyzed source of information in the social sciences. More than 20,000 research publications of many types are based on the GSS; and about 400,000 students use the GSS in their classes each year. Since 1985, the GSS has taken part in the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), a consortium of social scientists from 49 countries around the world. The ISSP asks an identical battery of questions in all countries; the U.S. version of these questions is incorporated into the GSS.
NORC at the University of Chicago is an independent research organization headquartered in downtown Chicago with additional offices on the University of Chicago's campus, the D.C. Metro area, Atlanta, Boston, and San Francisco. NORC also supports a nationwide field staff as well as international research operations. With clients throughout the world, NORC collaborates with government agencies, foundations, educational institutions, nonprofit organizations, and businesses to provide data and analysis that support informed decision making in key areas including health, education, economics, crime, justice, energy, security, and the environment. NORC's more than 70 years of leadership and experience in data collection, analysis, and disseminationcoupled with deep subject matter expertiseprovides the foundation for effective solutions.
[ | E-mail | Share ]
?
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
Global surveys show environmental concerns rank low among public concernsPublic release date: 25-Feb-2013 [ | E-mail | Share ]
Contact: Ray Boyer boyer-ray@norc.org 312-330-6433 NORC at the University of Chicago
Newly released international study reveals that environmental issues in general and global climate change in particular are a low priority for people in the United States and around the world
2/25/2013, Chicago, IL--A newly released international study reveals that the issue of climate change is not a priority for people in the United States and around the world.
The surveys showed that when asked to rank priority worries, people were five times more likely to point to the economy over the environment. Additionally, when asked about climate change, people identified the issue as more of a national problem than a personal concern.
Coordinated surveys, conducted by the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) in 33 countries from 1993 through 2010, "are the first and only surveys that put long-term attitudes toward environmental issues in general and global climate change in particular in an international perspective," said Tom W. Smith, Director of the General Social Survey, a project of the independent research organization NORC at the University of Chicago, and author of a paper that summarizes the surveys.
In the surveys, respondents were asked the relative importance of eight issues: health care, education, crime, the environment, immigration, the economy, terrorism and poverty.
The economy ranked highest in concern in 15 countries, followed by health care in eight, education in six, poverty in two, and terrorism and crime in one country each. Immigration and the environment did not make the top of the list in any country over the 17-year period; in the United States, the economy ranked as the highest concern, while concern for the environment ranked sixth.
In terms of national averages, the order of concern was the economy (25 percent); health care (22.2) education (15.6); poverty (11.6); crime (8.6) environment (4.7), immigration (4.1) and terrorism (2.6), the surveys showed. Terrorism's low ranking was notable in light of the widespread attention the issue has received since 2001, though it topped the list of concerns in Turkey.
The paper, "Public Attitudes towards Climate Change and Other Global Environmental Issues across Time and Countries, 1993-2010," was presented recently at the "Policy Workshop: Public Attitudes and Environmental Policy in Canada and Europe, Canada-European Transatlantic Dialogue," at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada.
NORC is issuing the survey summary on behalf of the ISSP, a consortium of survey research organizations in 49 countries. The ISSP coordinates studies on topics worldwide and uses the same scientific standards to make the findings representative of the nations' populations.
A focus on the environment
In the United States, only 3.6 percent of the people surveyed selected the environment as the nation's most pressing issue, as opposed to 15 percent of the people in Norway, which had the highest level of environmental concern.
The surveys also asked questions about worries concerning particular kinds of environmental problems, including global climate change. One asked which problem among nine was most important for their country as a whole as opposed to the individual.
Air pollution ranked first in 13 countries, followed by climate change, which was the top concern in 10 countries. In another question, the surveys asked people which environmental problem they considered most personally dangerous and found that in only three countries was climate change listed as the most dangerous environmental problem, trailing nuclear power plants and industrial air pollution.
"One reason for the relatively low ranking of climate change is that people often believed it did not directly affect them. Climate change is seen more as a country-level problem than as a personal problem," Smith said. "While 14.6 percent cited it as the most important environmental issue for their country, only 9 percent rated it first for themselves."
The latest surveys were completed in 2010. Similar surveys have been conducted since 1993, and little change has been noted on people's concern for climate change. Differences exist among the countries, however, suggesting that widespread public support for current action on the issue will represent a major shift in attitude.
The surveys indicate some expectation for greater future concern about climate change. "The greater mentioning of climate change as a problem by those under 30 versus those 70 and older probably reflects generational effects and if so, should tend to increase levels of concern in the future," Smith said.
Environmental issues are of greatest concern in Scandinavian nations, Switzerland and Canada. They were followed by France, Austria, Finland, the former West Germany, Taiwan, Korea, and New Zealand. Toward the bottom of the list are Croatia, Latvia, Chile, Turkey, Lithuania and Argentina.
Climate change was listed as the top environmental concern in Japan, West Germany, Canada, Britain and Scandinavia, where between 19 and 26 percent of the population indicated it was their top environmental issue.
###
Smith is co-founder of the ISSP and on the group's Standing Committee. He is also Past President the World
Association for Public Opinion Research.
The General Social Survey (GSS) is a project of NORC at the University of Chicago with principal funding provided by the National Science Foundation. It is a unique and valuable resource that has tracked the opinions and behaviors of Americans over the last four decades. The GSS is NORC's longest running project, and one of its most influential. Except for U.S. Census data, the GSS is the most frequently analyzed source of information in the social sciences. More than 20,000 research publications of many types are based on the GSS; and about 400,000 students use the GSS in their classes each year. Since 1985, the GSS has taken part in the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), a consortium of social scientists from 49 countries around the world. The ISSP asks an identical battery of questions in all countries; the U.S. version of these questions is incorporated into the GSS.
NORC at the University of Chicago is an independent research organization headquartered in downtown Chicago with additional offices on the University of Chicago's campus, the D.C. Metro area, Atlanta, Boston, and San Francisco. NORC also supports a nationwide field staff as well as international research operations. With clients throughout the world, NORC collaborates with government agencies, foundations, educational institutions, nonprofit organizations, and businesses to provide data and analysis that support informed decision making in key areas including health, education, economics, crime, justice, energy, security, and the environment. NORC's more than 70 years of leadership and experience in data collection, analysis, and disseminationcoupled with deep subject matter expertiseprovides the foundation for effective solutions.
[ | E-mail | Share ]
?
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
Disclaimer: By using this site, you explicitly agree to its Terms of Use and agree not to hold Simple Subjects, LLC or any of its members liable in any way for damages arising from decisions you make based on the information made available on this site. I am not a financial or investment advisor, and the information on this site is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.
Copyright 2013 Simple Subjects, LLC - All rights reserved. To be clear: This means that, aside from small quotations, the material on this site may not be republished elsewhere without my express permission. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Both are hurtful and have stigmas attached, but which is worse?
Sometimes it feels like we haven't come too far from shaming women ? la The Scarlett Letter's?Hester Prynne. And in some cases, the humiliation happens on national television.
After being interrupted by a drunk woman on Bourbon Street, a New Orleans TV reporter asked the 49ers fan, "How long have you had an STD?"
More from YourTango: 15 Strange Things You Hear In The Bedroom
Perhaps she was trying to make light of the awkward (live) situation or trying to push her away by embarrassing her ? which sort of worked (see the clip below). The partygoer, who does not have an STD, looked shocked and offended, calling the incident "disrespectful." ?And it was.
Whether the woman had an STD or not is sort of irrelevant, because of what the reporter was assuming about this woman's sexual behavior. Is it ever OK to publically call someone out for having an a sexually-transmitted disease, given the stigma behind it?
Like slut-shaming, this humiliation-tactic tied to sexuality is only becoming more widespread with the popularity of social media and technology ? think about how easy it is to hide behind a computer and type out that someone gets around or probably has HPV.
Given what society assumes about you when someone says you have an STD and when you're a slut: Which would you rather be called?
More from YourTango: 10 Ways To Erase Your Ex From Your Life
IDAHO FALLS, Idaho -- Idaho businessman Frank VanderSloot is suing Mother Jones magazine because he contends that he was defamed by an article that depicted him as a "gay-basher."
VanderSloot, the CEO of direct marketing company Melaleuca, filed the lawsuit in Idaho Falls' 7th District court on Tuesday. He says a February 2012 article about him and two tweets promoting it prompted national criticism.
The magazine's co-editor-in-chief Monika Bauerlein says Mother Jones stands by its reporting and she hasn't yet received official notification of the lawsuit.
VanderSloot is seeking nearly $75,000 in damages. The lawsuit focuses on the article titled, "Pyramid-Like Company Ponies Up $1 million for Mitt Romney." The term "gay-bashing" never appears in the story, but VanderSloot points to a tweet promoting the article that described him as Romney's "gay-bashing buddy."
In the lawsuit, VanderSloot contends that the term "gay-bashing" denotes violence, harassment or intimidation based on sexual orientation.
"I've never taken shots like this before," VanderSloot said. "I think it's particularly egregious to accuse somebody of a hate crime ... In my opinion, that's what gay-bashing is. The accusation is that I have bashed gay people."
The Mother Jones article said that VanderSloot outed a gay reporter for the Post Register in 2005 when he purchased a full-page ad in the newspaper criticizing the reporter's extensive work covering child sexual abuse and cover-up scandals in the Boy Scouts.
VanderSloot has maintained that the reporter's sexual orientation was publicly known before the advertisement hit newsstands in conservative eastern Idaho.
VanderSloot has gained attention in the past for his approach to gay rights issues. In 1999, he bought space on 25 billboards to protest a documentary called "It's Elementary" that aired on Idaho Public Television. The documentary discussed how schools approached the subject of homosexuality, and on the billboards VanderSloot said it promoted "the homosexual lifestyle of your children." In 2008, VanderSloot's wife, Belinda, contributed $100,000 to an independent group supporting a successful California effort to ban gay marriage.
The multi-millionaire businessman caught the notice of the national media when he became the national campaign finance co-chair of the Romney campaign.
The lawsuit states that the Mother Jones article created a "national media firestorm," including attention from "The Rachel Maddow Show," Rolling Stone magazine and Salon.com. VanderSloot said those organizations parroted falsehoods from the Mother Jones article.
"In today's age, it becomes an impossibility (to hold media) accountable regardless of how wrong it is," he said. "I believe that who you need to hold accountable are the people who fabricated the story in the first place."
Bauerlein, the co-editor in chief of Mother Jones, said that shortly after the article appeared on the magazine's website, VanderSloot and Melaleuca brought forth concerns about accuracy. The article was pulled off the website for a short time, and 10 days later, Mother Jones printed three corrections.
In September 2012, Bauerlein said Mother Jones editors met face-to-face with VanderSloot, and there was one follow-up conversation, but then communication between the parties ended.
We feel very comfortable with our reporting," Bauerlein said. "Mother Jones has a long and solid track record of journalistic excellence."
Posted on February 1, 2013 by Joe Anuta in City Comptroller, City Council, City Offices, Mayor, Public Advocate
City Comptroller John Liu explains the ways he wants to narrow the gap between the city's rich and poor. Photo by Christina Santucci
City Comptroller John Liu explains the ways he wants to narrow the gap between the city's rich and poor. Photo by Christina Santucci
City Comptroller John Liu believes the city?s cavernous income gap can be tackled through tax reform and a minimum wage increase, he told TimesLedger Newspapers in a recent interview at its offices.
Liu has not formally declared his intentions for Gracie Mansion, but has raised more than $3 million for the widely expected run. City Council Speaker Christine Quinn (D-Manhattan) also remains undeclared, though city Public Advocate Bill de Blasio and former Comptroller Bill Thompson have officially announced their candidacies.
?I do believe that change is in order,? said Liu, who served as a Flushing councilman before he was elected to citywide office in 2009. ?We have a problem that is only getting worse in terms of the economic divide.?
And that economic divide can be bridged by making the city?s income tax more progressive and by raising the minimum wage to $11.50, he said.
City taxes, levied by the state Department of Taxation and Finance, are not exactly flat, but the biggest income bracket indicates that a single person making $50,000 is taxed the same as a person making $500,000. Liu proposes to raise income taxes by 1 percent for the top 1 percent of income earners in the city.
?That actually would afford the other 99 percent of taxpayers in New York City a tax reduction,? he said.
And putting money into the pockets of the middle class means more money will be spent in the local economy, he said.
Liu also hopes to close some loopholes that allow big corporations to pay less in taxes and instead give tax breaks to small businesses.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg contends rasing taxes would drive corporations and the wealthy out of the city, according to Liu, who rejected that premise.
?At the end of the day, New York City is not a commodity. It is special,? he said.
He also supports an $11.50 minimum wage, which he said translates to an annual salary of $24,000 ? the amount the city has said is necessary for a wage earner to support two children and stay out of poverty.
As to how the city?s children have been educated under the current mayor, Liu gives the Bloomberg mixed marks, although he would not overhaul the system of mayoral control enacted in 2002, which effectively dissolved the old school board.
Liu would peg fewer outcomes ? funding, evaluations, school closings for example ? to test scores, a practice the comptroller said has been a trend in the current administration and has created a ?factory mentality? in the city?s classrooms.
?The mayor and the [city Department of Education] need to trust teachers to do their jobs,? he said.
One area where Liu and the mayor agree is on coastal development. Liu believes the city needs to reclaim its coastline, but in the wake of Superstorm Sandy, to do so more intelligently.
?I think we should stay the course,? Liu said of the mayor?s efforts to encourage building along the shore. ?We?ve lost track of our waterways.?
In the wake of the storm, Liu said he was open to exploring unprecedented infrastructure improvements such as storm barriers in New York City?s harbor that would block rising water levels associated with weather events, though it has been estimated to come with a roughly $10 billion price tag.
?The question becomes not so much can we afford such a storm barrier system,? he said, ?but can we afford to not have such a system.?
Bloomberg is asking for nearly $10 billion in aid for the city as a result of the storm?s damage.
Liu?s aspirations for citywide office have also been dogged by a federal court case. Two campaign workers are currently facing charges of wire fraud in Brooklyn federal court. The trial for Jia ?Jenny? Hou and Xing Wu ?Oliver? Pan, who are each accused of wire fraud, is set to begin next week.
The comptroller has not been charged with any wrongdoing.
Liu said it does not keep him up at night. His campaign recently send out a birthday invitation reading ??Embattled? Comptroller John Liu would like to invite you as a guest to his birthday fund-raiser tonight.?
Liu criticized some of the media coverage and said he is proud of the way his campaign has been run thus far.
Tags: Bill De Blasio, Christine Quinn, Department of Education, department of taxation and finance, John Liu, mayoral race, Michael Bloomberg, minimum wage gap
![[ Back to EurekAlert! ]](http://www.eurekalert.org/images/back2e.gif){kind=small}
Public release date: 25-Feb-2013
Share ] 
